;

Civil War Blog

A project of PA Historian

The Invalid Corps (or Veteran Reserve Corps)

Posted By on May 6, 2011

The Veteran Reserve Corps (originally the Invalid Corps) was a military reserve organization created within the Union Army during the Civil War to allow partially disabled or infirm soldiers (or former soldiers) to perform light duty, freeing able-bodied soldiers to serve on the front lines.

Philadelphia Inquirer, 11 June 1863

The Invalid Corps

Much importance is attached, by military men, to the proposed organization of an Invalid Corps, and many inquiries had been made from various parts of the country concerning it.  In order to facilitate the organization and supply the required information, the Assistant Provost Marshal-Generals, as general superintendents in the several States, will soon be furnished with all the necessary instructions and blanks.  This corps, though a novelty in our service, promises beneficial results both to invalid soldiers and the Government.  The term of enlistment is to be for three years, unless sooner discharged.

The corps will be required to perform all duties within the limit of their physical capacity, but for the convenience of service they will be selected for three grades of duty.  Those who are most efficient and able-bodied and capable of using the musket, performing guard duty, light marches, etc., will be assigned to companies of the first battalion.  Those of the next degree of physical efficiency, including all who have lost a hand or an arm, to the companies of the second battalion.  Those who are least effective and all who have lost a foot or a leg, to the companies of the third battalion.  These two classes are to be armed with swords.

In all cases where the physical infirmities of officers or enlisted men come within the provisions which do not disqualify enlisted men for service within the corps, they will be recommended for transfer or enlistment therein, but no one will be admitted whose previous record does not show he is meritorious and deserving, and that he has complied with the provisions authorizing an invalid corps.

Faithful soldiers whose physical infirmities are too great to admit of their being of any use in the invalid corps, will, nevertheless receive the pension and bounties provided by law.  It is further announced that no officer or enlisted man shall be entitled to receive any pension, premium or bounty for enlistment, re-enlistment or service in the invalid corps.  They will receive all other pay and allowances now authorized by law for the United States Infantry, excepting the increased pay for re-enlistment.  Claims for pensions or bounties, which may be due for previous service will not be invalidated by enlistment in the invalid corps.  But no pension can be drawn or accrue to the benefit of any man during his service in the Corps.

It is thought that there are twenty or thirty thousand now performing such duties as could be discharged by men coming within the provisions of the act creating the invalid corps.  Besides, it is believed that there are over one hundred and fifty thousand soldiers who have been discharged for disabilities, many, however of the slightest character.  The provisions of the law extend to marines.

Colonel R. H. Rush is in charge of the bureau appropriated to business pertaining to the invalid corps, under the general direction of Colonel Fry, Provost Marshal-General.

 

Farmers Cabinet, 24 March 1864

The Invalid Corps

By Justicus

O, have you never heard of the Invalid Corps?  Composed of old soldiers, whose place in the war is but little or nothing, except ‘tis to guard public buildings and stores, which they think dreadful hard.

O, haven’t you seen their uniform blue, on their backs, as your streets they gladly stump through?  O, haven’t you noticed how proudly they walk, toad-sticker in hand, on their boat as they stalk?

O, haven’t you seen, which you have, I’m sure, how sweet look the girls on the Vet’rans of war?

Although there’s an arm gone, or maybe a leg, the ladies (God bless them) they don[t care a peg.

But point them out proudly, with eyes full of foars, to the stay at home gentry, who lost in their tears, comprehend not the felling of love to our Flag.

Though unfit for the field, in the Invalid Corps they still do their duty, and can they more?

Can you coldly pass them and think of the day, when they kept back the foe in the battle’s fierce fray, and stood firm as granite, unmoved by the shock of the fierce rebel wave as it dashed on our rock?

Ah no! in your heart burns the Patriot’s flame, and you love our dear flag that shall never see shame; should the world be against us we’ll always be true to the glorious standard of Red, White and Blue.

And though we’re all cripples, our hears beat as strong with love to our country as those who belong to the army of Grant, Meade and Greek fire Gillmore, and we’ll stick to the blue of the Invalid Corps.

In addition to the above poem, the following song was found “glorifying” or poking fun at the Invalid Corps:

I wanted much to go to war,

And went to be examined;

The surgeon looked me o’er and o’er,

My back and chest he hammered.

Said he, You’re not the man for me,

Your lungs are much affected,

And likewise both your eyes are cock’d,

And otherwise defected.

Chorus:

So, now I’m with the invalids,

And cannot go and fight, sir!

The doctor told me so, you know,

Of course it must be right, sir!

Many men from the Lykens Valley area transferred to or enlisted in the Veteran Reserve Corps as the Invalid Corps came to be known.  They performed light duty until their discharge and most served admirably through the end of the war.  Those who were eligible for pensions began collecting them following their service.

News clippings are from the on-line resources of the Free Library of Philadelphia.

Cinco de Mayo, the Confederacy, and Gen. Jo Shelby

Posted By on May 5, 2011

Today is Cinco de Mayo (Fifth of May), a holiday that had its origins during the American Civil War.  It commemorates the Mexican army’s victory over the French forces of Napoleon III at the Battle of Puebla.  The holiday was actually created by Mexicans living in California who supported the cause of Mexican freedom.  Ironically, it is primarily celebrated in the United States today and focuses on Mexican heritage and pride.

Following the Mexican-American War of 1846-1848 and several subsequent wars, the Mexican treasury was nearly bankrupt.  On 17 July 1861, the Mexican President Benito Juarez called for a two-year moratorium on debt repayment, but this was not accepted by the European powers holding the debt.  As a result, France, Britain, and Spain sent their naval forces to Veracruz to collect payment.  After negotiation, Britain and Spain withdrew, but Napoleon III, then ruler of France, decided to establish the Second Mexican Empire which was to be controlled by French interests.

In late 1861, the French took the port city of Veracruz and advanced toward Mexico City.  Under surprisingly heavy resistance from the Mexicans, the French, who outnumbered the Mexicans two-to-one, were defeated at Puebla.  This victory was significant in that one of the strongest European powers had been soundly defeated in its imperialistic attempt to establish control of part of the North American continent.  But the French were able to re-group.  A year later, and with significant reinforcements, the Mexican army was defeated and Mexico City was taken.  The French established Emperor Maximilian I as ruler of Mexico.

The United States was helpless to fully support the Mexicans while the Civil War was raging.  But after 1865, assistance was provided and the French were expelled in 1867.  Maximillian I was executed along with the Mexican generals who had supported him.

The significance of the Battle of Puebla cannot be underestimated.  Many historians believe that the French goal was broader than establishing influence in Mexico.  Clearly, the French favored the Confederacy and by the Mexicans defeating the French at Puebla, direct aid to the Southern cause had to be postponed for a least a year – enough time for the Union army to strengthen and repel the rebels at Gettysburg.  By 1864, when the French finally were able to get control of Mexico, it was almost too late to use Mexico as a base to supply the Confederate army.  Thus, the Mexican victory at Puebla helped influence the outcome of the American Civil War.  At the conclusion of the American Civil War, the United States then supported the Mexicans in their efforts to repel the French.

One of the generally unknown stories of the post-Civil War period was the role that former Confederates played in Mexico in the period between 1865 and 1867.  Anthony Arthur, in his book General Jo Shelby’s March, has provided us with a vivid and detailed account of of those in Shelby’s “Iron Brigade” who refused to surrender to the Union forces and instead, fought their way into Mexico for what they hoped would be a new life.   The band of Confederate soldiers under Shelby arrived in Mexico City on 3 September 1865.  Although their political views were ambiguous (they had supplied weapons to the rebels), they found great sympathy for their social views with Maximillian‘s wife Carlotta who was charmed by Jo Shelby‘s “blue blood” heritage and warmly welcomed him into Mexico.  Shelby helped convince the Emperor that he could recruit tens of thousands of former Confederates who were greatly upset by the surrender and entice them to come to Mexico as “colonists”.  Many of these Confederates were ineligible for the general amnesty proposed during “reconstruction”.  This migration, Shelby and other argued, would elevate the educational and scientific levels of Maximilian‘s empire.

In one of Shelby’s first encounters with Maximilian, he proposed to recruit an elite army of 40,000 Americans who would serve as a protection for Maximilian and who would be much more competent that the Emperor’s “demonstrably incompetent Mexicans” who were then defending Maximilian.  Shelby tried to convince the Emperor that should the French withdraw, Maximilian would be left defenseless with what he then had as an army.  From Shelby’s own experience, and from his family history (his cousin was Frank Blair), he was convinced that diplomatic efforts by the United States would result in the French withdrawing support for Maximilian and leaving him defenseless in Mexico.  But Maximilian was not convinced that the French would abandon him and rejected Shelby’s offer to raise an army.  Instead, Maximilian issued an invitation to Shelby and all foreigners to become “land colonists” (farmers) in Mexico.  Thus began the efforts to recruit former Confederates with land grants of up to 640 acres per family.  The former Confederates could bring whatever they wished – farm animals, slaves, machinery – all duty free and with tax advantages for a period of five years.  Shelby accepted the officer and bade farewell to the men of his “Iron Brigade” who had followed him into Mexico.  Some joined Shelby as “land colonists” and other chose to join Maximilian’s existing army; few decided to return to the United States.

Thus, in September 1865, Shelby received a significant grant of land in the Cordoba Valley about 150 miles southwest of Mexico City.  Although it was a tropical area, it was high enough that yellow fever, common along the coast, was not a problem.  He sent for his wife Betty and two sons who booked passage from New Orleans to Veracruz and who joined him in November.

Maximilian had grandiose plans for the new colony which was named Carlota (after his wife), but the efforts were probably doomed from the start.  Agents were sent throughout the Old South to recruit colonists but few took up the offer.  Meanwhile, competition for economic franchises and social distractions within the court threatened to derail the Emperor’s plans.  And, diplomatic efforts by United States Secretary of State William Seward had a great effect of getting France to withdraw its support for Maximilian.

All Jo Shelby could see was that he was about to begin a new life.  But his bitterness remained. In a letter to a friend in Missouri in November 1865, he wrote:

I am here as an exile; defeated by the acts of the southern people themselves [who loved their lands] more than principle…. Let them reap what their deserved, eternal disgrace.  Damn ’em, they were foolish enough to think that by laying down their arms they would enjoy all the rights they once had.  [My] heart [is] heavy at the thought of being separated from you all forever; but I am not one of those to ask forgiveness for that which I believe to day is right.  The [Republican] party in power had manifested no leniency.

Returning to the United States would be dangerous, but there were challenges for the colonists, that although minimized at the time, would soon bring about the undoing of the colony.  The most formidable of these was the restlessness of the native population who had no say in the colony or in the political future of the country.  Maximilian tried to earn their loyalty by “good works” but was forced to issue decrees that punished “disloyalty” with execution.  Shelby and other colonists were forced to pay “protection money” in order to survive and it began to seem that Maximilian was losing enthusiasm for the venture. Shelby’s friends, who had accepted the land grants, began to abandon Mexico and fewer new immigrants were arriving to take their places.  In 1866, the Omealco Indians attacked a group of Confederate settlers and force-marched them to the coast where they could board ships back to the United States. Frequent nighttime raids by rebels left colonist’s property looted and burned, and many were taken prisoner and summarily executed or severely beaten.

In February 1867, the French, admitted their defeat in Mexico by withdrawing the last of their supporting armed forces.  But Shelby and Maximilian saw this as a positive.  They believed that the United States would then abandon any plans to challenge the regime since it seemed to them that the greatest annoyance to the United States was the French support for Maximilian and the presence of European troops in Mexico.  Shelby believed that with the number of former United States citizens (Confederates) having influence in Maximilian‘s court, the United States would never send an army into Mexico to overthrow Maximilian.

But events in Mexico were moving too quickly.  In July 1866, a third son was born to Jo and Betty Shelby, who they named Benjamin Gratz Shelby after Shelby’s step-father who helped raised him.  Now feeling more vulnerable than ever, Jo Shelby sent his wife and sons to Mexico City where they could be better protected.  As best he could, he maintained  his economic interests in Cordoba, but rebel activity forced him to seek safety in Mexico City.  He briefly considered returning to Missouri, but the news that Jefferson Davis was still in prison quickly changed his mind.  In October 1866, Maximilian‘s wife Carlota, hysterical and paranoid, was removed to Belgium to an asylum for the “mad” where she remained until her death nearly 61 years later.  Maximilian contemplated abdication but was persuaded from it by reports that he would not receive any leniency from the rebels.

Meanwhile, back in the War Department in Washington, General Philip Sheridan was pursuing the idea of marching an army into Mexico to extricate the former Confederates and bring relief to the Mexican rebels.  Sheridan believed that the continued presence of those having antipathy towards the United States and the harboring of them by Maximilian‘s regime was not a good thing for the future of either country.

Sensing Maximilian‘s indecisiveness and the rapidly eroding support for the regime, Shelby took steps in March 1867 to book passage for his wife and children back to New Orleans.  Staying in Mexico only to try to salvage some of his business interests, Shelby rightly concluded that Maximilian was doomed.  In June 1867, Shelby boarded the American gunship Tacony at Veracruz and headed back to the United States, his confidence in eventual amnesty bolstered by the news that Jefferson Davis had been released from prison in May.  A few days after Shelby boarded the Tacony, despite pleas from the international community, Maximilian was executed.  The new president of Mexico would be Benito Juarez who had signed the death sentence for Maximilian.

The reconciliation period for Jo Shelby began in 1867.  His return to Missouri to raise a family – eventually eight children (seven boys and a girl) – and re-establishment of business interests – as well as appointment to the post of U.S. marshal for western Missouri – will have to be left to others to recount.

Thus, the events of Cinco de Mayo, 5 May 1862, celebrated today as a holiday in the United States, although not conclusive in driving the French from Mexico, eventually resulted in a period of French-supported rule in Mexico and the establishment of Maximilian whose “empire” lasted until 1867.  The significance of the Mexican victory at Puebla was the postponement of French aid to the Confederacy until it was too late in the American Civil War to have any meaning or effect.   But coinciding with the rise and fall of Maxmillian‘s empire was the establishment of  colonies of Confederate exiles and the adventures of Jo Shelby and others in supporting Maxmillian‘s regime.

For historians of the Gratz family and those interested in the history of Gratz, Pennsylvania, it is noted that Benjamin Gratz, who was the step-father of Jo Shelby, was the younger brother of Simon Gratz, the founder of Gratz, Pennsylvania.

The picture,  “Charge of the Mexican Cavalry at the Battle of Puebla” was posted on Wikipedia and was released into the public domain.  Information for this post was taken from Wikipedia and from the aforementioned book, General Jo Shelby’s March.  See also: Civil War Descendants of Nathaniel Gist.

St. John (Hill) Church and Cemetery

Posted By on May 3, 2011

The popular name, “The Hill Church” was given to St. John Evangelical Lutheran Church, because it is situated on a hill about a quarter mile south of Berrysburg, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, and from the church and cemetery the surrounding countryside can be seen for many miles in each direction.

According to its 1780 date of organization, it is the second oldest church in the Lykens Valley area, although preaching began at this site simultaneously with several other congregations in the valley.  The Rev. J. Michael Enderline was the pioneer missionary who began the church here and then extended his services eastward into Schuylkill County and northward into Northumberland County and Snyder county.  Until 1791, services were held in private residences.  At that time a schoolhouse was built which was also used as a place of worship.  It the early years it was called “The Schoolhouse Congregation.”

In 1797, a separate log church was built, but this was not fully completed until 1798 or dedicated until 1802.  That log church was the worship site of the congregation during the Civil War.  The present church building was erected in 1876.  Since 1895, the church has had its own pastor and unlike other churches in the area, it never served as a “union” church of Lutheran and Reformed congregations.

St. John’s Evangelical Lutheran Church Cemetery Association was established in 1932.

Some of the Civil War veterans buried in the cemetery are:

Anthony Betz —- Aaron Deibler —- Emanuel Koppenhaver —- Solomon Matter — B. J. Moyer —- Joseph E. Ulman —- Capt. George W. Wade —- B. F. Enderline —- John Kemmerer.

Anthony Betz

Aaron deibler

Solomon Matter

Joseph E. Ulman

John Kemmerer

Pastors who served the church during the Civil War were:

F. Waltz (1854-1864) and Jeremiah Shindel (1865-1870).

Additional photos of the St. John (Hill ) Church and Cemetery:

Some of the information for this post was taken from the Historical Book of Berrysburg and Mifflin Township.

Civil War Draft Registration Records, 1863-1865

Posted By on May 2, 2011

 

Click on picture to enlarge

From 1863 to 1865, four drafts took place in the United States.  The draft call of 1863 required registration of eligible men between the ages of 20 and 45, divided into two classes as described below in the Ancestry.com data base, U.S. Civil War Draft Registration Records, 1863-1865:

This is a collection of lists of Civil War Draft Registrations. There were four drafts between 1863 and 1865, which included 3.175 million records. Historically, the 1863 draft was one of the most tenuous moments in the Union outside of the battles fought on Northern soil. Most of the concern was due to the draft riots that took place in New York in 1863.

These records include 631 volumes of registries and are basically lists of individuals who registered for the draft. The records are split into two different classes, Class I are those aged 20-35 as well as those 36-45 and unmarried. Class II is everyone else that registered.

The registry contains information including:

  • Class
  • Congressional district
  • County
  • State
  • Residence
  • Name
  • Age on 1 July 1863
  • Race
  • Profession
  • Married status
  • Birthplace
  • Former military service
  • Remarks

In the page shown above for part of Halifax Township and Lykens Township, we note that these townships in Dauphin County were part of the Fourteenth Congressional District of Pennsylvania which included Dauphin, Snyder, Juniata, Union, and Northumberland Counties.  There are some names listed that do not appear in the Civil War Veterans List for this Civil War Research Project – because the Civil War Veterans List only contains those who actually served.  Since the data base, Civil War Draft Registration Records,  is a “Draft Registration” list, it includes all those who registered.  Others may appear on the Civil War Veterans List for this project who may not have registered or been drafted, but they enlisted anyway; others were drafted but chose to enlist, or to pay $300 for a substitute – which was permitted.

The records can be accessed at the National Archives or on-line to subscribers of Ancestry.com.  The Ancestry.com records are fully searchable.  A search for Lykens Township resident Harrison Riegle produces the following result:

By clicking on the “View Original Image” icon on Ancestry.com, the image shown at the top of this post is produced.  Harrison Riegle’s name appears on the bottom line of the page.  The records can also be “browsed.”  The page shown is page 252 of 623 of one of the volumes for Pennsylvania.  This volume shows the townships arranged alphabetically from L-Z.  The browsed pages give a “census” of eligible men from the Congressional district in July 1863.

While no previous military service is given for any of the men shown on the above page (they would appear on a Class II page), many pages do give such service and therefore are a good way of identifying those who had served earlier in the war (prior to July 1863) and includes the name of the military regiment.

An additional type of page, Class III,  is shown and not described in the Ancestry.com description.  An example of a Class III page is shown below.  Class III included those who were at the time of the draft serving in military units:

Click on picture to enlarge.

David Brown, shown on a line for Lykens Township, was a subject of a previous post on this blog.  David is shown then currently serving in the 177th Pennsylvania Infantry.

Much research still needs to be done on the Draft of 1863 and subsequent drafts.  The records described above have recently been made available on Ancestry.com and have not yet been completely analyzed.  Readers are invited to submit comments and additional information.

The screen capture is from Ancestry.com.

Source: Ancestry.com. Consolidated Lists of Civil War Draft Registrations, 1863-1865. NM-65, entry 172, 620 volumes. Records of the Provost Marshal General’s Bureau (Civil War), Record Group 110. National Archives, Washington D.C.

The 1863 Draft for Upper Dauphin County

Posted By on May 1, 2011

In July of 1863, President Lincoln issued a proclamation ordering a draft to raise five hundred thousand men for the Union army. It was the first compulsory draft in American history.  The draft was intended to encourage enlistment, but in many cases it had the opposite effect.  Federal troops had to be called out in several states to enforce it – including in Pennsylvania – and opposition was particularly strong to a provision where a drafted man could pay $300 to a substitute who would take his place in the army.  Unskilled workers barely made $300 in a year and could not afford to pay to get out of the war.  This led to the statement that this was a “rich man’s war and a poor man’s fight.”

Two previous posts focused on the draft conducted in 1862:  Pennsylvania Drafted Militia and the Draft of 1862; and Opposition to the Draft of 1862.

This post focuses on the draft held in August of 1863 in Dauphin County to fill the requirements of the federal draft.

From the Philadelphia Inquirer of 11 August 1863 (picture above):

The Draft at Harrisburg

Special to the Inquirer

Harrisburg – August 10 – The drawing in this city, commenced this morning, at seven o’clock, and passed off with entire good feeling.  The draft in Conewego and Derry townships and the first four wards of Harrisburg, in which four hundred and fifty names were drawn, was completed this afternoon.  Quite a number of negroes were among the victims.

A blind man who was also blind-folded, drew the names from the wheel.

Your correspondent was among the drafted.

From a story in The Evening Telegraph, of Harrisburg, 10-12 August 1863:

The conscription for Dauphin County was commenced this morning, by Marshal Clement, assisted by his associates in the board of enrollment.  An immense staging had been erected immediately in front of the Court House, where “the wheel of fortune” was put into operation, and as name after name of those drafted was drawn from the “box,” the crowd assembled gave vent to cheers, while such of the drafted as were present received the congratulation with a grace which showed at least the acquiescence the law receives at the hands of orderly and loyal men.  Indeed the good humor and decorum which prevailed during the entire proceeding of the draft today, is as much due to the decency, patriotism and intelligence of the people of Dauphin county, as it is to any vigor, efficiency or preparation on the part of those engaged in this delicate business….

Philip Ensminger, esq., a blind man, was blindfolded and drew the names from the wheel.  Mesrs. George J. Shoemaker and William Bergstresser, Democrats, and John J. Shoemaker, and Aaron Bombaugh, Republicans, occupied seats on the platform, by invitation, to see that everything was conducted fairly.

The results were reported by townships:

Halifax Township & Halifax Borough

Christian Shott — Samuel Hoke —- Amos Clenson —- Samuel Reisch —- Peter Chubb —- Henry Forman —- George Masoner —- William Hershberger —- Henry Nace —- Jacob H. Dunkle —- Jacob Zimmerman —- Jacob S. Wombough —- Jacob Mier —- James M. Parsons —- John Ferren —- Joseph Ziegler —- George N. Spiece —- George W. Lodge —- Simon Novinger —- Samuel Folckler —- Benjamin B. Brubaker —- John Proudfoot —- Philip Fitting —- Jacob Tyson —- Samuel Steel —- Josiah Jury —- David Shultz — John Bowes —- Henry Corsnits —- Philip Saultzbaugh —- Silas Lontz —- James Snyder —- Solomon File —- George Whitman —- Hiram Chubb —- John Barfield —- Samuel Greiner —- William H. Snyder

Jackson Township

Philip Zimmerman —- James Miller —- George Greiner —- Edward Shoap —- Henry Hoover —- Michael Miller —- Anrew D. Straw —- John E. Nace —- Charles E. Reigel —- Samuel Miller —- Samuel Fitting —- Joseph Keiter —- Samuel B. Miller —- Daniel Miller —- Josiah Hope —- Daniel Grim —- Daniel Witmer —- Michael Warfel —- John P. Miller —- John W. Bordner —- Moses Fender —- Joseph McLally

Jefferson Township

Samuel Sheetz —- Jacob Minnich —- Joseph Fauber —- Josiah Wilker —- Anthony Long —- John Bowerman —- Josiah Daupsey —- John Yerdes —- Joseph Paul —- Samuel Minnich —- Isaac Shiley —- John Hawk —- Jacob Rice —- Samuel Hoover —- John C. McCallain —- William Shoop —- William Miller —- John Sheetz —- George Scholander —- George Buffington —- Levi B. Frees —- Henry Buffington —- Samuel Lebo —- James Hoffman

Lykens Township and Gratz Borough

Andrew Riegel —- Emanuel Schoffstall —- Jacob Smiths —- Jonas Umholtz —- Daniel Tobias —- John D. Baum —- Henry Biery —- Henry Rickert —- Josiah R. Riegel —- George Knorr —- Henry B. Williard —- William Schockstrow —- John Willard —- Josiah Huber —- William Unger —- Jonas Keiser —- Solomon Gottshall —- Cornelius Hawk —- Aaron Raber —- Charles Coleman —- Joseph Reisinger —- Isaac Hoffman —- Thomas Huber —- Joel Daniel —- Samuel Buffington —- elias Kissinger —- Samuel Shell —- Jacob Romberger —- Zachariah Laudenslager —- Franklin Laudenslager —- Franklin Fidler — Samuel Klinger —- Jonas Hoffman —- Daniel Coleman —- Joseph Sallady

Mifflin Township

William Welker —- John W. Deibler —- George H. Rumbarger —- Jeremiah Harman —- Daniel Bardner —- Jeremiah H. Enterline —- John B. Disher —- Martin Straub —- John readel —- John Fuller —- Josiah Schoffstall —- Jacob Moyer —- Bostian Hensinger —- Henry W. Bishoff —- George D. Moyer —- Jacob Krutzer —- Jonathan Bonawitz —- Josiah Yeager —- Zachariah Badman —- Josiah A. Miller —- John W. Whitcomb —- Franklin Sarge —- Daniel Snyder —- Isaah Keel —- D. F. Swingle —- Henry Harman —- John Hoffman —- John Mace —- Joseph Stesler —- John Koppenhoffer —- Jeremiah Carl —- Dresden Miller —- John Andre —- Hiram F. Groff —- Isaac Weaver —- Balser Rumberger —- Frederick Harman —- Jacob enkert —- John Metz —- Daniel Wiest —- Emanuel Erdman —- John Klinger —- Elias Byerly —- William S. Dollinger —- John D. Deibler

Upper Paxton Township

Andrew Ossman —- Joseph Cramer —- David Ficklinger —- George W. Fralick —- Uriah Martz —- Isaac Negley —- Michael Hollabaugh —- Samuel Snyder —- John D. Radell —- Henry Poticher —- Daniel Spotts —- A. H. Overholtzer —- James Richardson —- Andrew Kieffer —- Jacob Snyder —- Thomas Heit —- Samuel E. Gilbert —- Emanuel Lenkart —- John F. Fiskinger —- Levi Leber —- John Martin —- Samuel Peters —- Solomon Hoover —- Nathaniel Feidt —- John P. Woland

Millersburg Borough

John C. Beiler —- Andrew J. Williams —- Jonas Wert —- Jacob F. Saltzbach —- William T. Jacoby —- William A. Smith

Reed Township

James F. Pearson —- Henry Frank —- Jacob Chubb —- Richard Derr —- Cyrus Glace —- Robert Porter —- Ashel Lukens —- Henry Hauss —- Jacquete Rouch —- John R. Rouch —- Melchior Miller —- William D. Miller

Rush Township

Randall McAllister —- Adam Carver

Washington Township

Emanuel Wetzel —- John Longaback —- John K. Harman —- Thomas Diener —- Henry D. Miller —- Jacob Runk —- John Klinger —- Henry Lenker —- William Strawbecker —- Josiah Boyer —- D. K. Holtman —- George Carl —- John Deitrich —- Washington Matter —- William Brittain —- Joel Shoop —- Daniel Messner —- Henry Shoop —- Henry Kennerer —- John Bretz —- Emanuel T. Motter —- Henry Schrefler —- George Hawk —- Assane Polk —- William Wingert —- Samuel Bechtol —- Silas Cooper —- Jonas Pottorff —- John W. Messner —- George Lenker —- John B. Stroub

Wiconisco Township & Lykens Borough

Samuel Vaun —- George Wall —- Thomas Perkins —- Joseph Durbin —- Thomas Bateman —- Richard Knight —- Isaac Burd —- Emanuel Zerbe —- Israel Lukes —- Anthony Hawk —- David Budesil —- William Gilbert —- William Trout —- Barnhart Blatzer —- Josiah Row —- John Shell —- Benjamin Waters —- Jonathan Hoffman —- Samuel Matter —- John Row —- Edward Matter —- Lewis Shoener —- Cornelius Row —- Samuel Durbin —- Enoch Stetzell —- Michael Walchaskey —- George W. Buffington —- John Shaffstall —- Isaac Shomper —- Jacob Miller —- William Harper —- Joseph Rumbarger —- Charles Walcott —- William Row —- George Wagner —- Thomas Mailey —- Joseph Shupp —- Alfred Foster —- John Bridkley —- Thomas Fegley —- Robert Beatel —- Augustus Walborn —- William Price —- Cyrus Marke —- James Fegley —- William Rosener —- Timothy Carner —- Jacob Wagner —- Daniel Nailer —- Moses Betz —- James L. Groover —- William Zimmerman —- David Splan —- Lewis Smeltzer —- William Bleistone —- Mathias Tollman —- Patrick Carner

News item from the Philadelphia Inquirer is from the on-line resources of the Free Library of Philadelphia.  Some of the names from the Harrisburg Evening Telegraph article have been modified to conform to known or most common spellings as they are found in other records.