;

Civil War Blog

A project of PA Historian

Fake Lincoln Photos – Lincoln with the 5th New York Cavalry

Posted By on November 2, 2016

lincoln5thnycav-001

The photograph shown above was purportedly taken by O. Pierre Havens of Ossining, New York in either 1862 or 1863, of the camp of the 5th New York Cavalry.  In the center of the picture, seated, is a man wearing a top hat.  While many people have concluded that the man is Abraham Lincoln, Stefan Lorant, author of Lincoln, A Picture Story of His Life (page 308), is skeptical.

lincoln5thnycav-001a

An enlargement of the center of the picture is shown above.  Lorant believes that the casual and informal attitudes of the soldiers in the picture makes it unlikely that it is Lincoln.  But if it is not Lincoln, then who is it?

For a more complete discussion of this photograph, see Civil War Talk.

 

 

 

 

The Most Mispronounced Words When Describing the Civil War

Posted By on October 31, 2016

civilwarspokenhere-001

There is a handy book for those who frequently discuss the Civil War and want to make sure that they are correctly pronouncing the names of people, places and battles associated with it.  Civil War Spoken Here, by Robert David Quigley, was published by C. W. Historicals of Collingswood, New Jersey, in 1993.  As the full title states, it is a “dictionary of mispronounced” things of the 1860s.  Quigley is a former radio talk show host who has made it his mission to make sure the words associated with the Civil War are pronounced correctly.

The book provides a simplified pronunciation key, much like the ones used in the phrase dictionaries used by world travelers who have no foreign language skills.

It may surprise Pennsylvanians (and others) to find out that they could be pronouncing “Gettysburg” incorrectly.  In the following excerpt, Quigley presents the following:

Consider the fact that countless people mispronounce this most famous of Civil War names,  The most common mispronunciation is GET-eez-burg, and this makes sense, since that is how the name is spelled.  Spelling notwithstanding, the proper pronunciation is [GET-iss-burg]….

This, and many other corrections are presented throughout the book.  For those from the Northeast who travel South, knowing how to pronounce “Beaufort” depends on which “Beaufort” is referred to.  In North Carolina, “Beaufort” is BOH-furt, while in South Carolina, “Beaufort” is BYOO-furt.

 

 

 

A History of the 150th Pennsylvania Infantry – Including Reports of a “Bucktail” from Killinger

Posted By on October 28, 2016

150thhistorycover-001

Today’s post features an 1895 history of a Civil War regiment formed of men including Henry M. Kieffer, who was living in Killinger, Upper Paxton Township, Dauphin County, in 1860, and was the son of Dr. Ephraim Kieffer, a pastor of St. David’s Reformed Church in that place during most of the years of the Civil War.  For that reason, is important as a reference for Millersburg and Upper Paxton Township at the time of the Civil War.  It is especially important because Henry M. “Harry” Kieffer, who served as a Hospital Steward in that regiment, is mentioned as one of the chief contributors to the work.

Chamberlin, Lieutenant-Colonel Thomas (Historian of the Survivors’ Association).  History of the One Hundred and Fiftieth Regiment Pennsylvania Volunteers, Second Regiment, Bucktail Brigade [150th Pennsylvania Infantry].  Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company, 1895.

This book is available as a free download from the Internet Archive.

For the convenience of readers of this blog, the Preface and Table of Contents (chapter list) are given here:

Preface

Now that nearly a third of a century has elapsed since the 150th Regiment Pennsylvania Volunteers gathered to the colors, when inquiry is made about the beginnings of the organization, the recollections of many of its most intelligent members are found to be more or less confused, and on some points quite unreliable.  Is it that the infancy of a regiment, like that of an individual, has nothing in it of significant value to be remembered and preserved to posterity?  Possibly not much.  Yet, if even for a few of those still living who fought in the great War for the Union; or for the friends who were, for valid reasons, unable to share their trials, but watched with solicitude their progress in the field; or for the larger number of those who pride themselves on their descent from the patriotic actors in that grand tragedy, the birth and early movements of a particular military body have their interest, it is a sufficient warrant for noting in permanent form all that may be known of them.

It is scarcely a matter of wonder that the minute details of the organization of a regiment are so imperfectly recalled by its members.  In the first days of his enlistment the eager soldier looks forward to the time of important deeds and chafes at every hour’s delay in town or camp.  However seriously his ambitions may be modified by actual experience of warfare, his desire at the start is to meet the foe as promptly as possible,– to hear the rattle of musketry, the clash of sabres, the boom of cannon, and to snuff the intoxicating smoke of battle.  All else is “rubbish.”  Only after marching orders have set the machine of which he is a part in motion is the patient military “chronicler of small things” developed.  Pocket annals blossom then on every side.  Soon, however, the ardor of many would-be-historians is chilled as the strain of daily duty grows more severe, and of diaries it is presently only a question of the “survival of the fittest.”

After the transfer of the 150th from Harrisburg to Washington, the materials for a circumstantial account of its doings and experiences grow more abundant.  It is the previous gap that is difficult to bridge over,  But as some old and valued nurse is usually at hand to clear up misty points of family history or chronology, so there are still those left who stood in a manner as nurses to the infant organization, and, besides witnessing its birth, watched its growth, followed or shared the actions of its vigorous maturity, and continue to enjoy the memory of its achievements.  From these have been gathered, as opportunity offered, many facts which — of of small general value — may prove interesting to the surviving members of the regiment and to their families and friends.

The narrative of the campaigns of the 150th — its tent life, marches, and battled — has been drawn from all available sources — chiefly from diaries kept by enlisted men and from letters written from the field, supplemented by the recollections of field-, staff-, and line-officers, as well as of the rank and file.  Nothing has been set down without careful authentication, and where the memory of witnesses has clashed in respect to any important incident, everything possible has been done to reconcile the disagreement and reach the actual fact.

Acknowledgments are due to General H. S. Huidekoper and Brevet Major R. L. Ashhurst for the use of valuable private army correspondence; to Colonel George W. Jones, Captain H. K. Lukens, and Sergeant William R. Ramsey for many items of interest; to Adjutant William Wright for written accounts of the battles of the North Anna and Hatcher’s Run, and of the expedition to Fall Brook; to Rev. H. M. Kieffer, D.D., for copies of his weekly reports, as hospital steward, for the greater part of the year 1864; and to Sergeant Albert Mealey, Corporal George A. Dixon, and Frank H. Elvidge, all of Company A, for the loan of diaries,– that of Private Elvidge in particular, on account of its covering a longer period of time and entering more fully into the details of each day’s operations, proving the most serviceable contribution received from any quarter.  Thanks are also due to many other members of the regiment for valuable suggestions and assistance from time to time as the work progressed, and to Mr. Ellicott Fisher, brother of the late Captain Harvey Fisher, of Company A, for the use of letters and papers left by the latter, relating to his army career.

If many matters are recalled by members of the command which find no place in this history,– such as instances of individual daring, humorous or pathetic happenings, unique experiences in camp or field,– their absence is explained by the fact that repeated requests for material of this kind received but a meagre response, to the regret of the writer, who knows the value of incident and anecdote in such a narrative.  His work has been done painstakingly and conscientiously, in hours with difficulty snatched from an exacting business; and if his book, which is truly a labor of love, have no other merit, it is at least, or aims to be, a faithful presentation of the truth.

Philadelphia, 10 April 1895.

Table of Contents

I. Organization — The Philadelphia Companies………. 11

II.  To Harrisburg — Regimental Organization……….  21

III.  Concerning the “Bucktail Brigade” ………. 27

IV. On to Washington — In Washington ……….31

V. Social and Other Matters ………. 38

VI. Details and Duty — Breaking Up of the Camp ………. 42

VII.  Washington in the Winter of 1862-1863 ………. 49

VIII. To the Front — Belle Plain ………. 55

IX.  Various Happenings In and Out of Camp ………. 62

X.  Night March to Fort Conway — Artillery Engagement at Pollock’s Mills ………. 72

XI. Chancellorsville ………. 80

XII. In Camp of White Oak Church ………. 91

XIII. To Gettysburg ………. 101

XIV.  Gettysburg — First Day ……….. 110

XV.  Gettysburg, To a Finish .,……… 131

XVI.  Return to Virginia — From Pillar to Post ………. 146

XVII. From Centerville Back to the “Old Stomping Ground” — Warrenton Junction — Mine Run — Paoli Mills ………. 156

XVIII. Culpepper — Raccoon Ford — A Wound-be Incapable — An Appeal to Cesar — Resignations ………. 169

XIX.  Across the Rapidan — The Wilderness ………. 182

XX.  Laurel Hill — Spottsylvania ………. 193

XXI. The Affair at the North Anna — Topopotomov ………. 201

XXII.  From Cold Harbor to Petersburg ………. 209

XXIII.  Fort Sedgwick (or “Hill”) — Making Converts — Weldon Railroad …….. 222

XXIV.  Fort Dushane — First Movement on Hatcher’s Run …….. 232

XXV.  In Winter Quarters — Exchange of Arms — Presidential Election — Second Weldon Railroad Expedition — Second Hatcher’s Run (or Dabney’s Mill) ………. 243

XXVI. To Elmira, New York — Guarding Conscripts — Expedition to Fall Brook, Pennsylvania, and a Bloodless Victory — Muster Out and Final Pay — Home Again ………. 250

APPENDIX ………. 261

 

 

Summary of the Murder of Mrs. Sarah Klinger, Civil War Pensioner

Posted By on October 26, 2016

From the Mount Carmel Item (Pennsylvania), 17 February 1910:

FISHER ESCAPES GALLOWS:  CONFESSES TO THE CRIME

JURY RENDERED SECOND DEGREE VERDICT AT 8:50 LAST NIGHT– JUDGE SAVIDGE DECLARES FISHER GUILTY, SENTENCES HIM TO TWENTY YEARS IN JAIL — MURDERER CONFESSED TO SHERIFF ON WAY BACK TO JAIL

Henry Fisher, the foulest degenerate that ever drew breath in this county, has escaped the gallows and being assured that he cannot hang for his terrible crime has confessed that he was guilty of the murder for which he was thrice tried.  This in brief is the story.

The jury in the case reached an agreement at 8:30 last night and twenty minutes later filed into Court Room No. One where the foreman announced that they found Henry Fisher guilty of murder in the second degree.  When this announcement percolated through the murderer’s head his face lit up with a great joy.  Attorneys for Fisher announced that they were satisfied with the verdict and would take no appeal.

Fisher Sentenced

Judge Savidge then called Fisher to the bar and said, “Fisher, you known that you killed the old woman.  Do you know of any reason why you should not be sentenced?”  Fisher replied, “I did not kill the old woman.”  The Judge replied, “You did kill her and I, therefore, sentence you to serve twenty years at hard labor in solitary confinement in the Eastern Penitentiary and to pay a fine of $5.”

Fisher seemed appalled for an instant and then asked, “When does the sentence begin, Judge?”  Judge Savidge said, “It begins tonight.  You will not escape serving the full time merely because you have already served three or four years in jail.”

Fisher Confesses

Sheriff Taby then escorted the murderer back to the county jail.  On the way Fisher confessed to the sheriff.  He declared that his wife had planned the murder in order to get the old woman’s money.  Fisher declared that Mrs. Fisher hit the old woman over the head with a poker and that in falling her head struck the door latch, the crime being committed in the kitchen of the home on Water Street.  Fisher then hit the woman with a stove raker, knocking her down again.  This time in falling Mrs. Klinger’s face struck the corner of the Fisher children’s play box, inflicting the injuries to the nose which puzzled the officials.

Fisher then went into details of the crime saying that he and his wife carried the body of the then dead woman into the parlor and placed it at the foot of the stairs leading from the second floor in order to create the impression that she had fallen down stairs.  He declared that the crime was committed earlier in the day than was shown in the evidence, the guilty man pointing out how the Commonwealth had erred in this testimony.  According to the testimony, Mrs. Fisher cleaned up the blood from the floor with the shirt which was later found in the outhouse.  They both worked to destroy all evidences of the crime and left the place together.  Fisher returning later in the morning when he was seen by several persons.

How Jury Stood

Briefly told the following covers the history of the time the jury was out:   The first ballot resulted. 6 first degree, 2 second, 3 voluntary manslaughter and one not voting.  One member of the jury, a farmer, cried continuously while the jury was out.  Ballot after ballot was taken and at no single time did any juror vote for acquittal. At one time the vote stood 8 for first degree and 4 for second degree.  The it stood 6 for first and 6 for second; then 5 first and 7 second; then for sixteen straight ballots the jury was equally divided between first and second degree; after which the jurors slowly commenced to change to second degree murder.  It was stated by several of the jurors that in not a single instance did any of the coal region members of the jury vote for first degree murder.

History of Case

With the sentencing of Fisher to twenty years at hard labor, in solitary confinement, in the Eastern Penitentiary, there comes to an end the most celebrated murder case in the history of this county.  Mrs. Sarah Klinger, one of Shamokin’s most notorious females, was found lying dead at the foot of the stairs in her home on Water Street, Shamokin, on the evening of 26 November 1906 [sic].  Her scull had been crushed and evidences of having been choked also appeared.  The dead woman was last seen alive on the morning of the day of the crime.  Fisher was seen with her.  Fisher was immediately suspected and was arrested the same evening.

County Detective William Geise started on the case the next day and a search of the premises revealed Fisher’s blood stained underwear and outer shirt concealed in an outhouse on the premises.  The clothing he wore when arrested were examined and found to be covered with blood.  He also had in his possession several articles, including a knife, which belonged to Mrs. Klinger.  Other evidence, including Fisher’s own statements and his strange actions, wove a chain of circumstantial evidence about him that made it certain he had committed the crime.  Following several hearings before Justice McCormick the murderer was remanded to jail to await trial.

The accused man, having no funds with which to procure legal talent to defend him, Judge Savidge appointed Messrs. C. K. Morganroth, J. I. Welsh and J. A. Welsh, of Shamokin, to defend him.  The trial was called for the May 1907 term of criminal court but Fisher’s condition was such at that time to make a trial impossible.  The man shammed insanity in a manner that would have done credit to a Booth or Mansfield.  He was brought into court and immediately fell on the floor, growling like a dog and emitting other strange sounds while at the same time his expression was that of a wild man.  A sanity board was appointed to examine into the man’s sanity and this board reported him to be insane.  Accordingly Fisher was removed to the Danville Insane Asylum.  Once inside the doors of the institution the murderer discarded his pretense or sham and proved to be a model inmate.  He discoursed all subjects with the keepers and becoming very intimate with an aged keeper confessed to him that e had killed Mrs. Klinger following a fight caused by the woman’s refusal to give him money.  Unfortunately for the Commonwealth, the keeper died before his evidence could be procured in the form of a deposition.

Fisher was tried in September 1907, the jury reaching a verdict of first degree murder within an hour after it had retired.  The case was appealed to the Supreme Court on the ground that the trial judge had admitted as testimony certain letters which Fisher had written to his wife, the letters being written by a fellow prisoner at the murderer’s dictation.  In these letters Fisher accused his wife of the crime, telling how she killed Mrs. Klinger.  The letters being privileged communications between husbant and wife, were ruled as inadmissible by the higher court and a new trial was granted.

The murderer was again tried and again convicted the jury being out only a few hours.  Attorneys Morganroth, Welsh and Welsh again appealed to the Supreme Court for a new trial on the ground that the jury had been allowed to communicate with outside parties in the course of the trial and had also been separated a number of times. Although the attorneys made a mistake in preparing their appeal book by failing to name the separation of the jury as a “assignment of error” the higher court took cognizance of the violation of the law and granted a new trial, the opinion of the higher court being couched in condemnatory terms in regard to the lax method pursued in the lower court in the case of the jurors.

For the third time Fisher was brought before the court on Monday February 7th to answer of a change of venue which was refused. Three days were consumed in procuring a jury, two special venires being necessary before the  twelfth juror was procured.  Three Mount Carmel residents were members of the jury, Messrs. Allen, Robson and Frank Stine.  After several days of taking evidence the case went to the jury on Tuesday morning at 11:30 and a verdict was reached last evening as above stated.

The case will go down as one of the most determined legal battles in the history of the state, the attorneys for the defendant having put up a legal battle that attracted statewide attention.  Every possible legal attention was taken in an effort to secure a lower verdict for the murderer.  The counsel practically acknowledged the guilt of the prisoner but maintained that Fisher was not morally responsible owing to a loathsome disease with which they claimed had affected his mind, and that therefore he ought not to be hung for the crime.  With the sentiment of the entire population of the county against them they continued their fight showing a determination that awoke the admiration, if not the approval of everybody.  Never before has a penniless, friendless degenerate, such as Henry Fisher is, received such remarkable legal protection.  Nothing was left undone to benefit his cause.  The attorneys for the defense worked night and day to secure evidence in securing a lesser verdict than first degree murder.

While Messrs. J. I.Welsh and J. A. Welsh were previously known throughout the county as able criminal lawyers the name of Attorney Charles K. Morganroth was not so well known.  But with the first Fisher case he displayed a legal knowledge and thoroughness of preparation that placed him in the front rank of the county’s barristers.  To Attorney Morganroth fell the duty of preparing the cases, arranging the evidence as well as preparing the book for appealing the case to the higher court.  The tasks were hard ones but were faithfully carried out and established the young attorney’s ability.

It is estimated that it has cost Northumberland County almost ten thousand dollars to try Fisher.  The first trial cost in the neighborhood of $1000, including the fees of the attorneys for the defense, which the county paid.  The second trial cost the same amount probably a trifle more.  As the county also paid the entire expenses of appealing the cases to the Supreme Court, the printing of the paper books which for the defense alone cost more than $1500, this item ran more than $2500.  It cost more than $1000 to secure a jury for the trial which closed yesterday, as much more for the presentation of the case by the Commonwealth and about the same amount for the defense as each of the defendant’s lawyers will receive $200 for their work in the third trial.

Henry Fisher is a type of degenerate seldom seen.  He is afflicted with a disease as loathsome as leprosy and for more than fifteen years has been known as a robber, chicken thief and barn burner.  His present condition is such that he will never live to serve out his term in the penitentiary.  As evidence of his physical condition it need but be stated that his attorneys absolutely refused to touch his person or to even approach nearer to him than was absolutely necessary.  The case will end with the placing of the murderer in a cell in the state prison near [sic] Philadelphia.


News article from Newspapers.com.

 

 

 

 

Fake Lincoln Photos – Changing Trains at Hanover Junction

Posted By on October 24, 2016

lincolnhanoverjunction-001

Hanover Junction, c. 1863. (Library of Congress)

The photograph shown above is of the railroad station at Hanover Junction, Pennsylvania.  On his trip to Gettysburg on 18 November 1863, Abraham Lincoln had to change trains there.  There has been a great deal of speculation as to whether the man standing on the platform between the two trains is Lincoln.

In his book, Lincoln, A Picture Story of His Life, Stefan Lorant, page 309, analyzes the photograph to determine whether it is of Lincoln.

Some of Lorant’s conclusions:

  1. The photo is attributed to Brady.  However, Brady was in New York City on 18 November 1863 taking pictures of the arrival of the Russian fleet visiting there.  He did not make the trip to Gettysburg.
  2. Lincoln reached Hanover Junction at around 5 p.m. on 18 November 1863 whereas the sun set that day at 4:42 p.m.  There is too much light in the picture.
  3. None of Lincoln’s staff who accompanied him to Gettysburg are seen in the picture.

lincolnhanoverjunction-001a

But the final conclusion by Lorant comes from a super-enlargement of the figures on the platform:  “The man with the umbrella is not Lincoln.”