;

Civil War Blog

A project of PA Historian

Abraham Lincoln on Stamps – Commemorative Issues, 1909-1958

Posted By on March 26, 2013

Between 1909 and 1959, there were very few commemorative stamp issues of the United States that honored Abraham Lincoln.  The issue of 1909, for the Centenary of Lincoln’s birth (pictured below) was mentioned here in a blog post in late January.

For those readers new to this series of posts on Abraham Lincoln on Stamps, the difference between a “commemorative issue” and a “regular issue” is that regular issues were usually available for several years, were issued in multiple denominations selected to meet a variety of postal rates, and for much of the 19th and 20th centuries honored important individuals or American scenes without regard to special anniversaries related to them.  “Commemorative issues” were usually a larger sized stamp, were only available for a short period, and often recognized important anniversaries of individuals or events – or were issued to promote  specific events such as expositions or exhibitions.  The first commemorative stamps of the United States were issued in multiple denominations – the Columbian Exposition Issue of 1893 being the first example (larger stamp, 16 denominations).  The Abraham Lincoln stamp of 1909 departed from the then established pattern by being issued in only one denomination and by being issued in the smaller size that seemed to be reserved for regular issues.

Later in the year 1909, a stamp was issued that pictured William H. Seward, Lincoln’s Secretary of State – in a larger design format but in only one denomination.  Also in 1909, two stamps were issued for the celebration of the discovery of the Hudson River and the Centenary of Robert Fulton‘s steamship, the Clermont.  Then in 1915, the United States Post Office returned to its multiple-denomination commemorative sets with the issuance of Panama-Pacific Exposition stamps recognizing Vasco Nunez de Balboa, the Panama Canal, the Golden Gate, and the discovery of San Francisco Bay.  In fact, the commemorative issues of the early 1920s continued to be in this same pattern – “sets” in the larger format and multiple denominations – and with only a few exceptions, this pattern continued into the late 1920s.

But what is more noticeable when examining the stamp issues of this period, is what is missing.  No stamp recognized the 50th anniversary of the Civil War or any of the any of the events associated with the Civil War.  Thus, between 1911 and 1915, the Civil War – at least as the Post Office Department was concerned – was not part of the American memory.   Perhaps as a concession to the Depression Years, the commemorative issues of 1929 through the early 1930s were issued in the small size (same as the regular issues – and the same size and color as the Lincoln commemorative issue of 1909).

In the period from 1909 through the mid-1930s, no event or person directly related the Civil War was seen on a United States commemorative stamp – unless the John Ericsson Memorial Issue of 1926 is counted – he designed the ironclad Monitor, which is not mentioned on the stamp.  Many commemorative stamps during this period did recognize events and people of the Revolutionary War, the sesquicentennial of which took place at that time.

In 1936-1937, the Post Office issued two sets of commemorative stamps in honor of the U.S. Army and the U.S. Navy.  One stamp in the Army set, pictured the two most prominent Confederate generals, Robert E. Lee and Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson and another the three most prominent Union generals, William T. Sherman, Ulysses S. Grant, and Philip H. Sheridan.

Lincoln had to wait until 1940, when on October 20 of that year, a commemorative issue recognizing the 75th Anniversary of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution was issued at the World’s Fair in New York – almost an afterthought as the fair was concluding in that year.

The stamp pictured the Emancipation Monument or Freedman’s Memorial near the Capitol.  It was designed, sculpted, and erected in 1876 by Thomas Ball, and before the Lincoln Memorial was built in Washington, the statue was also referred to as the “Lincoln Monument.”

According to Wikipedia:

The monument depicts Abraham Lincoln in his role of the “Great Emancipator” freeing a male African American slave modeled on Archer Alexander. The ex-slave is depicted on one knee, with one fist clenched, shirtless and shackled at the president’s feet….

Despite being paid for by African Americans, historian Kirk Savage in 1997 condemned it as “a monument entrenched in and perpetuating racist ideology” because of the supplicant and inferior position of the Black figure.

Thus, Lincoln’s second appearance on a U.S. commemorative stamp was not without controversy.

In 1937, the opening shots in what was to become World War II, were fired in China in what was then called the Second Sino-Japanese War.  After the five years of struggle of the Chinese people against Japanese aggression, and the entry of the U.S. into what had then become a global conflict, the Post Office issued the third commemorative stamp recognizing Abraham Lincoln – and this time he also shared the design.  In keeping with the policy of not depicting living individuals on stamps, the “solidarity” of the U.S. could not be shown with the then Chinese leader Gen. Chiang Kai-shek, but had to be “historical” – the comparison of our own Abraham Lincoln with the founder of the Chinese Republic, Sun Yat-sen.

Appropriately, the stamp was issued in Denver, Colorado, where on July 7, 1911, while in Denver, Sun learned of the Chinese Revolution – after which he hastily returned to Shanghai where he was inaugurated as Provisional President of the Chinese Republic.  The stamp design compares Sun’s “Three Principles of the People” (in Chinese, “nationalism, democracy, and the people’s livelihood”) with Lincoln’s closing remarks at Gettysburg (in English, “of the people, by the people, for the people”).  This stamp was also the first “bilingual” stamp ever issued by the United States (not counting any Latin mottoes).

The Gettysburg Address, was repeated as a stamp subject in 1948 – oddly on the 85th anniversary of the event – in what might be the only U.S. stamp ever issued to commemorate the 85th anniversary of an event.

The stamp design featured Lincoln and the concluding words of the Address:  “That government of the people. by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

Between 1948 and 1958, Lincoln failed to appear again on a U.S. commemorative stamp – although, as has been previously noted here, he did appear on a Regular Issue stamp of the Liberty Series – and for the only time, the stamp was of the face value that was used as the first-class-one-ounce-letter-rate.

As the sesquicentennial of Lincoln’s birth approached, greater interest in him emerged and a set of stamps for that anniversary was planned.  Those stamps were planned for 1959 – but for some unknown reason, another Lincoln stamp design pre-empted that series.

On August 27, 1958, a commemorative stamp was issued for the Centenary of the Lincoln-Douglas Debates – which took place in Illinois in a campaign for the U.S. Senate – which Lincoln lost, but which gave him national exposure and helped him, and the Republican Party, win the Election of 1860.  Many philatelists consider the Lincoln-Douglas stamp to be part of the Lincoln Sesquicentennial Issue – but its purpose and issue date are not consistent with directly honoring the 150th anniversary of Lincoln’s birth.

The Lincoln-Douglas Debate Issue was released at Freeport, Illinois, the location of one of the debates.  The stamp pictures Lincoln and Douglas before a crowd.  The design was based on a painting by Joseph Boggs Beale.

This concludes the story of the Lincoln commemorative stamp issues that were released between 1909 and 1959.  The next post in this series, Abraham Lincoln on Stamps, will look at the three stamps issued 1959 for the Sesquicentennial of Lincoln’s birth.  Future posts will examine the Lincoln-related commemorative stamps that were issued after 1959 as well as the Civil War Centennial issues of 1961-1965.

——————-

Other previous parts of this study can be found in the following posts:  Early Postage Stamps Honoring Abraham Lincoln and Postage Stamps Honoring Abraham Lincoln – Bureau of Engraving and Printing to 1909.

Much of the information for this post was taken from Abraham Lincoln on Postage Stamps, privately published in 2000 as a companion to a stamp collection and exhibit that was displayed at a county historical society in Pennsylvania in conjunction with the 135th Anniversary of the Lincoln Assassination.

What Jake’s Reading: March 2013

Posted By on March 25, 2013

Trying to find time to read these days has been difficult. Between volunteering, schoolwork, my internship and research, it’s been a pretty tight squeeze of late. Yet, the Civil War and related subjects seem to have taken up most of my time, much to the irritation of those around me.

I finished Tony Horwitz’s marquee work, Confederates in the Attic, back in January and the book thoroughly moved me. For being 15 years old, the book surprisingly maintains much of its relevancy. Horwitz’s adventures through the South of the 1990s feel important, despite many societal changes that have occured. His work provides a look into Dixie most never see, one hidden by a veil of idiosyncrasy and misunderstanding . Horwitz, through his storytelling and unique characters, examines the Civil War, how it’s remembered, and why it maintains such significance to us today .  So if you haven’t read it yet, I highly recommend diving into the tales of the South’s many hidden corners.

C. in the Attic

I bring this book up not only because it stirred me, but because I also had an interesting encounter..

The star of Horwitz’s book, other than the consistent theme of America’s love/hate relationship with their fratricidal conflict, was a hardcore reenactor by the name of Robert Lee Hodge. He stole the show in the book, filling chapters with his eccentric, often insane behavior, and landing on the cover. Interestingly enough, Hodge also attended the conference at Gettysburg College earlier this month, his distinctive dark beard standing out from the crowd of historians. I only recently discovered the depth with which his inclusion in Confederates in the Attic changed his life, and his story also warrants a read through. Who would think this guy could go from “Civil War bum” to nationally recognized expert and filmmaker?

The New Yorker, 1998

The New Yorker, 1998

I also mention my relationship with Horwitz’s first book because I am reading his most recent jab at another issue surrounding the Civil War. Instead of Civil War remembrance and collective memory, Horwitz chases down John Brown and his conspirators in Midnight Rising. From what I have read so far, which I must admit is not much, the book reports on the rise of John Brown and what led him to Harpers Ferry in October 1859. The style relates much to Horwitz’s own writing technique honed during years spent as a reporter for the Wall Street Journal and it reads quickly and easily.

midnight-rising

I have found that audiobooks have become an important part of my scholarly life as well, mostly because I rarely have the time to sit down with a good book for more than a few minutes. I recently listened to James McPherson’s recent work on the Union and Confederate navies, War on the Waters. McPherson has written a fantastic book which tells a story that is often overlooked or forgotten all together; a few snippets of that book may work their way into a post later about the naval importance of good ole’ Pennsylvania anthracite coal.

war-on-the-waters-cover

Currently, I have been listening to Gettysburg by Stephen Sears and have found it fascinating as well. Sears does an incredible job of telling such a complicated and intricate story in a way that makes you feel as though you are marching along towards Gettysburg.

Iphone
My obsession continues, and as we head for the 150th anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg, the prospects of it getting any better seem slim…..

Contact me anytime with comments, questions, or suggestions.

Touring the Petersburg National Battlefield – Battery 9

Posted By on March 24, 2013

Today’s blog post continues a multi-part series on the Petersburg National Battlefield – that portion of the battlefield which made up the Eastern Front, where the opening assaults and the Battles of the Crater and Fort Stedman occurred.  All parts of the series can be accessed by clicking on the series title here, Touring the Petersburg National Battlefield.  Recent photographs taken at the battlefield are interspersed with the official, interpretative statements made at the various tour stops as well as statements from the National Park Service brochures and web site.  Many men from the Lykens Valley area participated in this battle and the Battle of the Crater itself was noteworthy for the participation of coal miners from Schuylkill County.

Continuing now to Stop 3, Battery 9.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Black U.S. troops of Hink’s Division captured this position during the first day of fighting.  It is a 1-minute walk to the site of Meade Station, an important supply and hospital depot on the City Point and Army Line, the military railroad built during the siege.  The winter quarters of the Union IX Corps were in the surrounding area.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Re-created here are samples of some of the infantry earthworks that ringed Petersburg – works that one man said made the landscape resemble “an immense prairie dog village.”

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

As the siege wore on, assaults against entrenched positions became rare.  Most of the pitched battles at Petersburg took place beyond the flanks of the armies, as the Federals inexorably pushed westward to cut the rail lines and roads into the city.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Here at Petersburg on 15 June 1864, African American troops recorded their first major success of the war in Virginia:  “They made a splendid charge… and won a great favor in the eyes of white soldiers by their courage and bravery.”

After the capture of Battery 5, some of the 3,500 black troops swept southward, routing the Confederates before them.  At dusk, they charged on Battery 9 and swarmed over the works.  During two hours of fighting on the Dimmock Line that evening, the U. S. Colored Troops captured dozens of Confederates and six canons.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Meade Station Trail:  This 0.5 mile interpretive trail leads to three sites revealing different aspects of the Siege of Petersburg.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

The winter camp of the Union army is described and pictured on the above marker.

“The romance of a soldier’s life disappears in a siege.  The change of scenery and the lively marches are gone, and the same monotonous unvaried rounds of toil take their place.  Sunday and weekday are all alike.”

This quiet wood was once a busy encampment.  Here, during winter of 1864-1865, Union soldiers fought not Confederates, but boredom and toil. 

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

A replica of one of thousands of winter huts built by Union soldiers so they could survive the winter.

They drilled, they primped their huts, they read mail and newspapers, they played, and they waited – for their turn in the trenches (a dangerous assignment) or the call to battle.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

That call to battle came only three times to the Pennsylvanians camped near here.  On one of these –the morning of 25 March 1865 – they rushed from these camps to resist the Confederate breakthrough at Fort Stedman, one mile to the west.

Moving now onto Stop 4….

This series of posts on “Touring the Petersburg National Battlefield” will continue on Wednesday.

Touring the Petersburg National Battlefield – Battery 8

Posted By on March 23, 2013

Today’s blog post continues a multi-part series on the Petersburg National Battlefield – that portion of the battlefield which made up the Eastern Front, where the opening assaults and the Battles of the Crater and Fort Stedman occurred.  All parts of the series can be accessed by clicking on the series title here, Touring the Petersburg National Battlefield.  Recent photographs taken at the battlefield are interspersed with the official, interpretative statements made at the various tour stops as well as statements from the National Park Service brochures and web site.  Many men from the Lykens Valley area participated in this battle and the Battle of the Crater itself was noteworthy for the participation of coal miners from Schuylkill County.

Continuing now to Stop 2, Battery 8.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

This battery was captured by black U.S. troops and renamed Fort Friend for the large Friend House located nearby.  The fort was refaced and served as a supporting artillery position for the duration of the siege.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

On 15 June 1864, after seizing Battery 5, Union troops swept southward along the Dimmock Line.  Men of the 1st U.S. Colored Troops and 22nd U.S. Colored Troops captured Battery 8, overcoming heavy resistance from part of Brigadier General Henry A. Wise’s Virginia Brigade.  By the morning of 16 June 1864, the 1.5 miles of Confederate works between Batteries 3 and 11 were in Union hands.

 

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

After capturing this section of the Dimmock Line, the Federals incorporated parts of it, including Battery 8, into a second line of siege works.  Battery 8 would see combat only one more time, when Union guns here helped repel the Confederate breakthrough at Fort Stedman in March 1865.

Continue now to Stop 3, the subject of the blog post for tomorrow.

Touring the Petersburg National Battlefield – Battery 5 and the Dictator

Posted By on March 22, 2013

Today’s blog post continues a multi-part series on the Petersburg National Battlefield – that portion of the battlefield which made up the Eastern Front, where the opening assaults and the Battles of the Crater and Fort Stedman.  All parts of the series can be accessed by clicking on the series title here, Touring the Petersburg National Battlefield.  Recent photographs taken at the battlefield are interspersed with the official, interpretative statements made at the various tour stops as well as statements from the National Park Service brochures and web site.  Many men from the Lykens Valley area participated in this battle and the Battle of the Crater itself was noteworthy for the participation of coal miners from Schuylkill County.

Continuing now onto Battery 5 of the Dimmock Line and the Dictator Trail:

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

This 0.6 mile trail will take you through Battery 5 of the Confederate Dimmock Line, captured by the Federals on 15 June 1864.  Along the way you will also see the position of the famous Union mortar, the “Dictator.”  For almost three months in 1864, the “Dictator  (shown below), a 13-inch seacoast mortar, fired into the city of Petersburg.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

In 1862, two years before the first Federals appeared at the city’s gates, Confederate Captain Charles Dimmock oversaw the construction of a ten-mile line of defensive works ringing Petersburg.  In front of you is Battery 5, one of the largest of the fifty-five artillery positions in the Dimmock Line.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

*****

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

In 1862, two years before the first Federals appeared at the city’s gates, Confederate Captain Charles Dimmock oversaw the construction of a ten-mile line of defensive works ringing Petersburg.  In front of you is Battery 5, one of the largest of the fifty-five artillery positions in the Dimmock Line.

At 7 p.m. on 15 June 1864, the boom of Union cannons to the east foreshadowed a Union attack on the Dimmock Line.  Minutes later, soldiers of the Union Eighteenth Corps broke through the undermanned Confederate line and swarmed over the works here at Battery 5.  In two hours the Federals captured 1.5 miles of Petersburg’s defenses.

Though few Confederates stood between the Federals and the streets of Petersburg, Union Major General William F. Smith stopped his advance to wait for reinforcements.  Nine months of tedious, deadly siege would pass before the federals would again have such an opportunity to capture Petersburg.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

This 0.6 mile trail will take you through Battery 5 of the Confederate Dimmock Line, captured by the Federals on 15 June 1864.  Along the way you will also see the position of the famous Union mortar, the “Dictator.”  For almost three months in 1864, the “Dictator  (shown below), a 13-inch seacoast mortar, fired into the city of Petersburg.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

*****

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

In the cut below (shown in the above picture), was the railroad that ran into Petersburg.  Continuing on the trails, the “Dictator” can be seen.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Famous but militarily ineffective, the “Dictator” fired on Petersburg from this spot during July, August, and September 1864.

The Dictator was a 13-inch seacoast mortar similar to the one in front of you.  It was the largest gun used during the siege and could lob a 225-pound explosive shell more than two miles.  During its service in the siege, the “Dictator” fired 218 rounds at Petersburg and its defenses.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Return along the trail to the area near the Visitor Center.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Cross back over the Dimmock line, enter the car and continue the tour to Stop 2.

Tomorrow, Stop 2….